IES inc.
IES inc.
  • Home
  • Services
    • Reporting/Compliance
    • Emissions Quantification
    • LDAR Services
    • Air Dispersion & Modeling
    • GHG Compliance Training
    • Regulatory Strategy
    • Event and System Analysis
  • EnviroDesk
  • Past Projects
  • Team
  • Login
  • More
    • Home
    • Services
      • Reporting/Compliance
      • Emissions Quantification
      • LDAR Services
      • Air Dispersion & Modeling
      • GHG Compliance Training
      • Regulatory Strategy
      • Event and System Analysis
    • EnviroDesk
    • Past Projects
    • Team
    • Login
Schedule Free Consultation
  • Home
  • Services
    • Reporting/Compliance
    • Emissions Quantification
    • LDAR Services
    • Air Dispersion & Modeling
    • GHG Compliance Training
    • Regulatory Strategy
    • Event and System Analysis
  • EnviroDesk
  • Past Projects
  • Team
  • Login
Schedule Free Consultation

Event and System Analysis

Reconstruction and quantification of emission events, and full emission 

profiles for stations and gathering systems, from blowdowns and upsets through super-emitter response.

The Approach




Your largest emissions probably happened when nobody was measuring

Surveys and routine inventories capture what a site does in steady state. The largest releases rarely happen in steady state. Blowdowns, pigging runs, upsets, and unplanned venting are over in hours, sometimes minutes, and they drive a disproportionate share of a site's annual total.


They are also what gets noticed. Flyovers, satellites, and regulators catch events, not averages.


When one gets flagged, three questions follow: what happened, how much was released, and can you show it. Answering them takes the event reconstructed from your operating data, not estimated after the fact from a factor.


Contact Us

Capabilities

What we do

Event reconstruction

Blowdown and pigging quantification

Blowdown and pigging quantification

Volume, duration, and gas composition rebuilt from SCADA data, pressure records, and operating logs. The event is quantified from what the system actually did.

Blowdown and pigging quantification

Blowdown and pigging quantification

Blowdown and pigging quantification

Per-event calculations using real line volumes, pressures, and frequencies rather than annual averages that hide the large ones.

Other Large Release Events

Other Large Release Events

Other Large Release Events

Quantification and documentation for the upsets and abnormal releases that sit outside routine source categories, built so the record holds up in reporting and in review.

Super-emitter response

Other Large Release Events

Other Large Release Events

Reconstruction of what the site was doing at the time of a detection, so the response to the agency rests on an event timeline rather than a denial.

Third-party detection review

Third-party detection review

Third-party detection review

Flyover and satellite results evaluated against the site's operating record, to establish whether a detection reflects a real event, a routine operation, or a source outside your fence line.

System emission profiles

Third-party detection review

Third-party detection review

Where emissions originate across a station or gathering system, continuous and episodic together, ranked by contribution so effort goes where it changes the number.

Root cause and recurrence

Why an event happened, whether it is likely to happen again, and what operational or equipment change would prevent it.


Systems



Emissions at one point are often caused at another

A relief valve lifting at a station is frequently the end of a chain that started somewhere else: a pressure excursion upstream, a compressor trip, a control set point that no longer fits how the system runs.


Looking at a single site will find the release. Looking at the system finds the reason. That takes people who understand how stations and gathering systems actually operate, which is the part of this work that separates an explanation from a guess.




Why it matters



Events are the gap in every reconciliation

When a top-down site measurement disagrees with a bottom-up inventory, the difference is usually events that were never captured. Documenting them is what closes the gap under OGMP 2.0 Level 5, EU MRV requirements, and the reconciliation protocols buyers and verifiers are adopting.


The same record answers a super-emitter notification, supports routine GHG reporting, and gives you a basis for evaluating any third-party detection that lands on your acreage.


This work pairs directly with our field measurement. Measurement captures what the site emits continuously. Event analysis captures what it emits when something happens. Together they make up the full emission profile.


Process



How an engagement works

  • Define the question. A specific event, a third-party detection, or a system-wide profile.
  • Gather operating data. SCADA, pressure and flow records, maintenance logs, and operator accounts.
  • Reconstruct and quantify. Event volumes and timelines calculated from what the system actually did.
  • Reconcile. Results checked against measured data where it exists.
  • Report and recommend. Documentation built for the audience reviewing it, with operational changes worth considering.

Common questions

A release from an upset, malfunction, or abnormal operating condition that falls outside routine source categories. Subpart W now treats these as their own category, and they are the largest driver of disagreement between site-level and source-level emissions numbers.


Usually, if the operating data still exists. SCADA and pressure records are the foundation. The sooner we start after an event, the more complete the reconstruction.


Generally, facilities containing petroleum and natural gas systems that emit 25,000 metric tons CO2e or more per year. The determination turns on how facility boundaries are drawn across your segment, which is the most common source of error we find.


Preserve the operating data for the detection window before it rolls off, and start reconstructing what the site was doing at that time. The response depends on the event record.


They complement each other. Measurement quantifies what a site emits during a survey. Event analysis quantifies the releases that happen between surveys. Most reconciliation work needs both.


They complement each other. Measurement quantifies what a site emits during a survey. Event analysis quantifies the releases that happen between surveys. Most reconciliation work needs both.


Schedule a free consultation and IES will scope the engagement around your facilities, reporting obligations, and timeline.


Ready to Take the Next Step?

Whether you're facing a new reporting requirement, planning a field measurement campaign, or navigating a shifting regulatory landscape, the right guidance early on saves time and reduces risk down the road. Schedule a free consultation and let's map out what your next project needs to succeed.

Schedule Free Consultation
  • Login
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Blog

Innovative Environmental Solutions Inc.

Copyright © 2026 . IES - All Rights Reserved.  EnviroDesk is under active development. 

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept